
Wavves
By Arye Dworken
In the past year, there’s been a palpable tension between rock critics and “regular people.” In fact, based on the vocal support for Christopher R. Weingarten’s tirade at the Twitter-centric 140 Conference, most of the snoberatti believe that, yes, “the people [do] have awful taste” (citing Fleet Foxes’ popularity as a specific example).
“[It's] boring, bland, white people guitar music,” explains the Brooklyn-based freelancer. “It fucking sucks and I hate it.”
This burgeoning resentment towards blogs has led critics to champion divisive bands (Grizzly Bear, Dirty Projectors, Wavves) in mainstream publications, sparking a movement away from accessibility, as if to say “my ear buds are more developed than yours.” In my 10 years as a critic, I have never felt so caught in the middle. I understand the aforementioned artists and their brainy appeal but listening to Veckatimest all the way through feels like doing the Times‘ Sunday crossword puzzle—satisfying, frustrating and, ultimately, exhausting. On the other hand, the recent championing of pop acts like Phoenix (who’s sudden popularity, four albums in, is perplexing to say the least) and Little Boots hint that global warming has even frightened musicians into recycling ideas.
Passion Pit, the object of my initial resistance to all of the above, is nothing new. Nor is it, as Pitchfork’s Ian Cohen cloyingly declares, even remotely cool. “Their approach to danceable rock music is more Friday night than year-end-list,” Cohen writes in his Manners review. “It’s also distinctly, for a lack of a better term, American. It’s extroverted, brash, and unconcerned with nuance, each synthesizer used for maximum melodic impact instead of texture.” Other positive Passion Pit pieces have also featured back-handed jabs, including reviews in Filter (“I can already sense the love-it-or-leave-it polarization for listeners”) and Entertainment Weekly (“while the midtempo tunes often venture into cheesy ’80s-pop territory, the album’s dense sound rewards repeat listens”).
My initial problem with Passion Pit was simple: frontman Michael Angelakos sounds like Doug Marsch covering the Bee Gees over Hot Chip outtakes. Meanwhile, his backing band looks like extras from Freaks and Geeks—more at home in an Apple store uniform than the role of a “rock star.” Or as Jon Caramanica said in a New York Times review of Passion Pit’s recent Bowery Ballroom performance, “The show, like the record, suggested that even though Mr. Angelakos’ mood had morphed, his skill set and that of his band had not.”
I witnessed the same show as Caramanica, and have to admit that there’s something inherently charming in seeing Passion Pit live, in feeling the Bowery Ballroom floor expand and contract from the audience’s collective jumping. So much so, that it made me finally appreciate Passion Pit’s album. (I’m still not sure why Caramanica had been so unimpressed; maybe he prefers being surrounded by teenage girls.) At numerous points throughout the night, it was difficult to discern what were backing vocals and what were enthusiastic fans simply singing along, like during the deceivingly sweet “Little Secrets.”
Simply put, Saturday night boasted a genuine/saccharine atmosphere that would make Sunn O))) fans suffer from diabetic shock. It felt strange witnessing a buzz-worthy act without the latter half of the venue whining about how bored they were. And while it would be difficult to imagine Angelakos maintaning his heliumed voice throughout a 50-minute set, he made it through unstrained. This alone is commendable—I just wonder how many years he’ll be able to maintain it without resorting to castration.
Cohen’s P-fork remark (“Their approach to danceable rock music is more Friday night than year-end-list”) irritated me after the show as I thought about the widening gap between his two distinctions. “Friday night” presumably means fun, accessible, amenable, and comfortable, while, again, presumably, “year-end list” means critical, challenging, and arduous (like Panda Bear’s Person Pitch or the Knife’s Silent Shout, two records that scream “I get it.”). Why can’t our year-end lists include every day of the week? Blogging, or being a critic, isn’t always about calling it first. It’s about simply enjoying music and sharing it with others. And since music discovery has developed from a third-world dictatorship (You will like Japandroids! You will like Woods!) into a democracy, I can’t help but think that critics resent this fossilization, that they’re intentionally taking all the enjoyment out of music by preemptively dismissing the tastes of the masses. That’s like a Starbucks barista serving coffee while dismissing the customer’s skinny triple shot latte.








6 Responses to “DROP KICK THE CRITICS: Hey, Don’t Blame Us For ‘Bland White People Guitar Music,’ Or Wavves For That Matter”
well said.
I think the music critics and music bloggers have more influence on the masses than they realize.
I also enjoyed Weingarten’s rant!
I get what you’re saying, and moreover, respect how difficult it is to make that point, because someone (not me, but maybe someone) could find Panda Bear straight up listenable, but to make your point without alienating that guy… I hope that person is able to understand what you’re saying. Without examples, it would have been a beast to get across to the reader, so kudos: I think you did the job quite well.
Thanks for reading, guys. I appreciate the kind words.
I feel like I could have written much more about this because there’s still a lot more to say. But maybe that’s for another time…after Wavves sophomore record?
I dunno man. I like this article, but guys like the one in the video irk the fuck out of me. I take issue with “white people” being used in a pejorative sense–I don’t care for Fleet Foxes either, but still. It’s just elitism on another scale. I think declarations of “the death of music journalism” are greatly exaggerated. Whatever, I’m gonna go listen to Dark Was the Night now.
fuck music critics!
I think the issue here is that this guy wants maintain his job in a world where information technology is beginning to deem it unneeded. That is what he said, but apparently we need him because of the “because” factor. Critics make their money by appealing to the mainstream. Bloggers can appeal to whoever they want. However, I don’t think the music listening world is anymore separated than ever. I don’t think people who listened to rap in 1992 listened to anymore rock music than people who listen to rap in 2007. I mean give me a break.
I love Panda Bear, I don’t really like the Knife.
Music that appeals to me has a lot of soul and is new and honest. I could give a fuck less what some blog says.
However sites like pitchfork, well they might like some stuff i may not like, (say passion pit) they also have turned me onto stuff I do like.
And hate on pitchfork all you want, but they do review hip-hop, metal- punk, electronic and whatever, its up to the listener to seek out what they want to hear.
thats why GOD invented fucking radio stations that play “classic rock” and “todays alternative”
jeff